Services · Hybrid Models

Combining AI and Biology to Predict
Complex Toxicological Endpoints

Hybrid QSAR models integrate structural compound data with signals from multiple wet lab assays to predict complex toxicity endpoints — like chemical-induced carcinogenicity — that neither source could reliably model alone.

What are hybrid models?

The Hybrid Advantage

Pure in silico tools are fast and cover thousands of compounds — but carry inherent uncertainty and have limited applicability domain. In vivo approaches are gold-standard but slow, expensive, and have ethical issues. In vitro models provide experimentally grounded biological evidence and are more scalable and ethically favorable than in vivo studies; however, they may not fully capture organism-level complexity or long-term adverse outcomes. Hybrid models combine in silico with in vitro to predict the outcome of in vivo experiments.

We implemented a hybrid model specifically designed to predict the outcome of a chemical-induced two-year rodent carcinogenicity test based on the structure of the compound and its biological response to various in vitro tests.

Dramatic reduction of cost and time
Elimination of animal use
Near gold standard accuracy
Predicted 2-Year Mouse Carcinogenicity Outcomes
Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) as the Performance Metric
Prediction based on in vitro experimental results0.320
In silico alone0.473
Hybrid (in silico + in vitro)0.513

MCC scores for 2-year mouse carcinogenicity prediction across modelling approaches.

When hybrid models are the right choice

Hybrid approaches deliver the most value in specific scenarios.

Lead optimisation

Hybrid models score compounds using both structural features and biological assay signals — letting you flag and deprioritize toxic candidates early, before committing to costly in vivo studies. Compounds with unfavorable profiles are filtered out earlier in the development process.

Mechanistic validation

Because predictions are built on biological assay readouts, the model tells you which responses are driving a toxicity signal — not just whether a compound is likely carcinogenic, but through which biological pathway.

Regulatory dossier support

Regulators accept weight-of-evidence approaches. OECD-compliant in silico predictions combined with supporting in vitro assay data create a more compelling safety narrative — and a clearer path to submission — than either source alone.

Custom model training

Have proprietary experimental data? We can train custom QSAR models on your in-house assay results — combining your wet lab IP with our in silico infrastructure.

Interested in a hybrid approach?

Contact us to discuss your compound pipeline and we'll recommend the right combination of in silico and experimental methods.